logovo: (Default)
logovo ([personal profile] logovo) wrote2009-09-11 01:13 pm

That word might not mean what we think it means.

Reading some stuff today I saw several people talking about aca-fans (acafans? AcaFans?) and I'm starting to wonder if they mean the same thing I'm thinking when I hear acafans, as in actual people in academia, writing, publishing, teaching or fanlore's entry. Are people now using that word interchangeably with fans who are just into meta? Anyone else getting that impression?

Also, I still haven't watched SPN and I'm trying not to read spoilers but I'M FAILING SO BAD. Because I'm weak and impatient.
robin_arede: A treehouse  (Default)

[personal profile] robin_arede 2009-09-20 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
An independent scholar is someone who does scholarship but is not affiliated with a university in a position requiring scholarship (i.e. someone may work as an adjunct and do scholarship, but are not required to by their jobs). Independent scholars can also do other jobs--anything to earn a paycheck (and since academic hiring has sucked for decades, with administrators trying to wipe out tenure track jobs and exploiting more and more adjuncts who are poorly paid and in some states do not have insurance or any job security, there are many independent scholars out there, especially in the U.S. in the humanities where arguably, more PH.Ds thatn there are jobs are produced every year).

Excellent work is done by independent scholars: Douglas Anderson in Lord of the Rings, for example!

A lot of excellent work is one on fantastic literatures by independent scholars, and they can and do publish their work in peer-reviewed. The term refers to employment and affiliation, and not to the quality of their work although there are tenured academics who are prejudiced about independent scholars as a group.